The company boasted that its “wildly impactful” informational output had influenced perceptions the world over, having been seen by “many hundreds of millions of people and attracting comment as far as the UN Security Council.”īy Global Strategy’s reckoning, its success is attributable to “programming that is not designed on day one and delivered ‘come what may,’ but instead is rapidly iterated and re-deployed as the situation on-the-ground and our adversaries change.”
SPY AGENT GREEN KIT COST FREE
Questions abound about his complicity in the CIA’s torture of terror suspects as a result.Īccording to its Foreign Office submissions, Global Strategy began operating in Syria from “the earliest days” of Western attempts to destabilize the government of Bashar al-Assad, by convincing Syrians, Western citizens and foreign states that the Free Syrian Army was a legitimate, moderate alternative, while flooding international media with pro-opposition propaganda.
The company was founded by MI6 veteran Richard Barrett, who led the agency’s counter-terror operations before and after 9/11, a period in which British intelligence became intimately implicated in Washington’s monstrous extraordinary-rendition program. Leaked files reviewed by MintPress name her as a key staffer on a secret psychological warfare effort in Syria, funded by the British Foreign Office and delivered by shadowy communications firm Global Strategy Network. It appears that van den Berg is involved in other cloak-and-dagger efforts to surreptitiously influence unwitting target audiences.
While Emic was unmentioned, it borders on inconceivable the tactics so contentiously deployed weren’t influenced by the firm’s tutelage. The findings of a subsequent inquiry into the unit’s cloak-and-dagger activities were absolutely damning. Its intelligence branch went on to be embroiled in a string of high-profile scandals throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, harassing citizens with bizarre psychological operations and mining social media profiles for data without users’ approval, provoking outcry. Ever since, she has taught Cambridge Analytica-style information warfare techniques to militaries the world over.įor example, the Canadian armed forces spent vast sums on Emic’s services in 20. One week prior to Cambridge Analytica’s closure on May 1, 2018, Gaby van den Berg–who, among other things, created SCL’s patented, DARPA-approved “ Behavioral Dynamics Methodology,” which analyzes and profiles particular target audiences in order to identify optimal strategies for influencing their perceptions and actions– founded a new company in London, Emic Consulting. In fact, they have profited and prospered immensely in its wake. This undated photo is one of the few published online believed to show Gaby van den Berg, center, in Muscat, Oman.īy contrast, one senior SCL staffer seemingly pivotal to many of those unethical practices–although they deny it–has been unaffected by the scandal’s fallout. company director for seven years for offering unethical services, including “bribery or honey-trap stings, voter disengagement campaigns, obtaining information to discredit political opponents and spreading information anonymously in political campaigns.” In September 2020, Cambridge Analytica’s former CEO, Alexander Nix, was disqualified from serving as a U.K. The entire dispute raised serious public concerns about online privacy and the malign influence of behavioral advertising and microtargeting, which endure to this day. Since then, the company and its parent, SCL Group, have folded, with official investigations into their activities conducted in several countries, while Facebook has been fined a record $5 billion by the Federal Trade Commission for egregious breaches of user confidentiality. In brief, Cambridge Analytica exploited a Facebook loophole to harvest the personal data of up to 50 million Americans, in order to manipulate voters on behalf of a number of right-wing candidates–potentially including Donald Trump–and political campaigns in the U.S. It’s the latest development in a wide-ranging controversy that began in the first months of 2017 and shows little sign of abating. On April 4, plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit brought against Facebook over its data-sharing practices following the eruption of the Cambridge Analytica scandal filed a fresh motion, charging that the social media giant deliberately obstructed discovery of information revealing the scale of its malfeasance.
0 kommentar(er)
